JPofiler was developed by people behind ej-technologies and is described as
FusionReactor is also focused on production environments, whereas JProfiler is typically used during development. According to the folks behind the product, they believe that developers are looking for a range of developer-focused capabilities, which combine with metric data to bring a best-of-both-worlds solution to assist with error detection. It’s worth mentioning up-front that FusionReactor is marketed as a developer-focused Application Performance Monitor ( APM) tool. However, in the Java world, JProfiler plays a dominant role in the marketplace, and we’re taking this opportunity to compare it to FusionReactor. We concluded that for production-level profiling, FusionReactor is an undoubted winner. In our previous blog posts, we compared FusionReactor with open source java profiling tools such as GUI-based Java VisualVM, and terminal applications such as jcmdand jstack. In this post, we look at the JProfiler alternative FusionReactor and how the two compare. JProfiler alternatives – Comparing JProfiler with FusionReactor – the battle of the profilers Is FusionReactor an excellent alternative to JProfiler?.In FusionReactor, all the exceptions can be seen in the Error History tab.What FusionReactor supports that JProfiler doesn’t.Integration with application servers and IDEA.Excellent support for Java Enterprise Frameworks.Built-in support for Docker and Kubernetes.Monitoring threads – FusionReactor has the advantage.
Web metrics in Jprofiler alternative FusionReactor.Both present clean interfaces which are easy to use.Installation of FusionReactor – built for production environments.Installing JProfiler – some challenges in production.JProfiler alternatives – Comparing JProfiler with FusionReactor – the battle of the profilers.
0 kommentar(er)
